Informed Citizens. Accountable Power.

Grading of Written Work

This page provides detailed information on the grading criteria with respect to any written work:

Length:

Approximately 250 words

Grading:

  • Relevance of the essay to the topic selected (50%)

    • Are laws and doctrines discussed relevant to the selected topic? (25%)
    • Are all relevant laws and doctrines invoked? (25%)
  • Accuracy in the understanding and application of legal principles (50%)

    • Are the laws and doctrines described and applied with accuracy? (25%)
    • Does the discussion demonstrate an accurate understanding of the inter-connection between the different laws and doctrines invoked? (25%)

Part III of the Exam

Length:

Approximately 500 to 1,500 words

Grading:

  • Relevance of the essay to the topic selected (40%)

    • Are laws and doctrines discussed relevant to the selected topic? (20%)
    • Are all relevant laws and doctrines invoked? (20%)
  • Accuracy in the understanding and application of legal principles (40%)

    • Are the laws and doctrines described and applied with accuracy? (20%)
    • Does the discussion demonstrate an accurate understanding of the interconnection between the different laws and doctrines invoked? (20%)
  • Clarity and logical development of the arguments (20%)
    • Is the development of each argument clear and logical? (20%)

Short Essay in lieu of Part III of the Exam

Length:

Approximately 1,500 to 2,000 words

Due Date:

First day of the Exam Period

Grading:

  • Relevance of the essay to the topic selected (20%)

    • Are laws and doctrines discussed relevant to the selected topic? (10%)
    • Are all relevant laws and doctrines invoked? (10%)
    • Are any wholly irrelevant laws or doctrines invoked in the discussion? (- 5%)
  • Accuracy in the understanding and application of legal principles (40%)

    • Are the laws and doctrines described and applied with accuracy? (20%)
    • Does the discussion demonstrate an accurate understanding of the interconnection between the different laws and doctrines invoked? (20%)
  • Clarity and logical development of the arguments (30%)

    • More than mere relevance and accuracy, are concepts introduced developed with clarity with respect to their role and purpose? (15%)
    • Is the development of each argument clear and logical? (15%)
  • Overall understanding of the U.S. system (10%)
    • Does the discussion demonstrate an understanding of how the laws and doctrines invoked fit into the broad themes of U.S. Constitutional Law? (5%)
    • Is the discussion situated accurately in the broader context of the issues discussed in class? (5%)

 

Long Essay in lieu of the Entire Exam

Length:

Approximately 5,000 to 10,000 words

Due Date:

Last day of the Exam Period.

Grading:

  • Relevance of the essay to the topic selected (20%)
    • Are laws and doctrines discussed relevant to the selected topic? (10%)
    • Are all relevant laws and doctrines invoked? (10%)
    • Are any wholly irrelevant laws or doctrines invoked in the discussion? (- 5%)
  • Accuracy in the understanding and application of legal principles (20%)
    • Are the laws and doctrines described and applied with accuracy? (10%)
    • Does the discussion demonstrate an accurate understanding of the interconnection between the different laws and doctrines invoked? (10%)
    • Are there any wholly inaccurate descriptions? (- 5%)
  • Clarity and logical development of the arguments (20%)
    • More than mere relevance and accuracy, are concepts introduced developed with clarity with respect to their role and purpose? (10%)
    • Is the development of each argument clear and logical? (10%)
  • Overall understanding of the U.S. system (20%)
    • Does the discussion demonstrate an understanding of how the laws and doctrines invoked fit into the broad themes of U.S. Constitutional Law? (10%)
    • Is the discussion situated accurately in the broader context of the issues discussed in class? (10%)
  • Comparative Law Content (20%)
    • Is the comparative analysis rigorous and precise? (10%)
    • Are all comparisons convincing, accurate, and relevant? (10%)
    • Is there a want of genuine comparative analysis? In other words, is the comparative discussion merely descriptive? (-15%)